We Have It All
Forums Rules Register
Go Back   Aussie Pythons and Snakes
     
Recent Herp Discussion
Snake Id Please
Last post by saratoga
Today 10:18 AM
Bredli Mood swings
by Stainer
Last post by Emzie
Today 10:13 AM
What got you addicted to...
Last post by Emzie
Today 10:10 AM
View Single Post
  #25  
Old 19-Mar-08, 06:20 PM
mrmikk's Avatar
mrmikk mrmikk is offline
Q Dog
Subscriber
Join Date: Dec-06
Location: Redlands, SE Qld
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,040
Photos: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonno from ERD View Post
Glider, EPA have absolutely no jurisdiction over how much income you can make from your animals. What they do have jurisdiction over is the time frame between purchasing and selling an animal, how many animals you buy/sell, how many of a single species you possess at any one time and what species you have.
Jonno,

Not quite sure on the income part of your statement. While the EPA may not use income per se as a stand alone criteria to determine the commercialism of any particular 'venture'. You could be certain that it would form part of the EPA's brief of evidence in proving certain elements of the charges.

Put it this way, it is definitely not inadmissable under the rules of evidence and as long as that information was gained lawfully, there would not be a problem in the court accepting it as evidence.
__________________
Showcasing the native wildlife of the Redlands, Qld, Australia.
www.redlandswildlife.com
Approved by Admin
 

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:18 AM.