|
There are currently a few "reordering" schemes for Aussie pythons floating around. Don't worry to much about it. Go with the common/standard names and you will be fine. Nothing is "law" so to speak. Just because someone releases a paper with new names, does not mean that the scientific community will adopt that paper's suggestions. Even though some papers read like they are fact, or say things like "From now on species x will be known as species y." does not mean that those names will be used. It's all part of the scientific debate process, and unless you are actively involved in it, can be somewhat confusing to say the least.
As far as Aussie pythons go, there is still considerable debate as to the classification, history, and geneology. Pretty much, until a new name is adopted by the majority of the "experts" and researchers in the field, the safe bet is to use the name in common usage. Once you start seeing the name in common usage, then it's time to switch.
| 
