hmmmmm...i still think u hav issues, maybe u are in denial
i hav also kept a fair few gts and hav always thought they r non-venomous seeing as their bites dont hurt at all, they eat their food alive and they r classed in just about everything as non-venomous.
But u hav to think, if they r doing research on them by reliable herpetologists and they find venom then its gotta mean sumthan. It also might just be a reminant from gts a very long time ago, and thats all thats left of a venomous species as now they feed on prey easy to over power which means no venom is needed. So they might still hav glands but may not put them to use. Sort of like how pythons have spurs in which the back legs used to be, or how legless lizards (hence the name scaly-foot) have a flap of skin where the hind legs once occured. So although green tree snakes may be venomous, they may aswell stay classed as non-venomous. Even if they do inject venom, it doesnt mean that they hav to hav enlarged fangs, they like brown snakes may hav solid fangs with grooves in which the venom "rolls" down into the puncture wound, but this doesnt hav to mean that the "venomous fangs" hav to be any larger than other teeth. I am not 110% sure on this but it is my theory from wat i hav gathered and i am stickin by Brodie and venomdoc and believe that in some way common tree snakes r venomous.
Brendan.
