theres nothing proved either way if uv is needed or not. it has been proved that uv lighting wont stop DPS
Lots of things are said to "need" U.V but is yet to be proved.
If you need proof, research the lifespan of a wild Diamond that recieves UV and a captive bred Diamond that recieves none. You will find a difference of about 10 years atleast.
I mean in the wild a Diamond or any carpet would hardly eat a rat
What do you mean by this, Lewy? Are you saying rats dont make up much of a wild diamonds diet?
If you need proof, research the lifespan of a wild Diamond that recieves UV and a captive bred Diamond that recieves none. You will find a difference of about 10 years atleast.
Yes that's what Im saying IMO they would be more likely to eat birds, eggs, and other small mammals not fatty rats like what we breed for them and the rats they do eat like the Australian bush rat would have nearly no fat on them as they are very lean and fit lol
This is what I believe and I'm not saying that its correct
Cheers Lewy
Well i definately agree that rats in the wild are much more lean than captive bred lab rats, but i think rats make up a large part of a wild diamonds diet. Wild diamonds seem to congregate in areas that are high in rat densities(old houses and barns in the bush), and whenever i've seen a wild diamond regurgitate a meal, it's always been a rat.
This is just my opinion. I'm not saying you're wrong.
I think it all comes down to the quality of the rat.
Enter your email address to join: