The sad thing for all you anti hunters is that without all the big game hunters now we would not have a rhino left. It is the money from the hunters that protects the rhino and other endangered animals. i am glad that the authorities in africa see the big picture that letting a few rich yanks pay1000's of dollars to hunt a rhino or elephant is better than letting the local poachers kill them all for a couple bucks worth of horn or ivory.
The locals get jobs from the hunting which in turn makes them protect there income.
while you are sitting in front of the key board making uneducated statements search Zimbabwe.. and see what has happened to all the great game animals that that country once had.. before what happened now it was a trophy hunters heaven and the big bad hunters brought in money now the hunters left and the animals were worth nothing. i will let you guess what happened to the game animals and the rhino herds in zimbabwe.......... give you a hint mmmmmmmmmyummm roast rhino.
I no longer hunt but when i did it was not to make me more man-ly it was for the thrill of being in the bush with a bow ad testing my hunting skills against a worthy game animal.more often than not i lost but i had a good time.
Thanks for bringing this up. I did fairly in-depth studies on green hunting and big-5 hunting (with guns not tranquilizers) when in SA, and they are, by far, more healthy wildlife sanctuaries than some of the other bigger conservation parks. They are privately run, have a lot of money, and some of the best wildlife vets in the world on hand.
The animals are usually chosen selectively for each client (particularly the big 5 game) so that they know which animals are being tranq'd, or need to be replaced.
The huge amounts of money being saved does go into conservation and breeding programs - the TB-free lion and buffalo breeding programs I saw that were connected to these parks were second to none that I've seen.
Also, the larger conservation parks (not mentioning any names, but rhymes with Tortuga), have managed their parks and carrying capacities horribly, so now the parks are overrun by elephants (which cause MASSIVE amounts of environmental damage) and common but popular species such as zebra, which pushes out the less common species, or those more specific to their niche, like sable. So the hunting parks have managed to save species by tailoring areas in their parks to these less common species, because people will pay so much more for a trophy-photo with one, or a carcass. The money generated means they can fund really good breeding programs and wildlife management schemes tailored to these species, so that they don't become extinct, even if a few do end up on hunters' walls.
It's a multi-faceted topic, but from what I've seen, a 100% animal-lover approach isn't the right course of action in this case, if we want to manage the wildlife in parks properly, particularly the less-common species that don't bring in the tourist dollars. IMO.