I will reply to individual comments first, and then explain the real situation at the end.
Nighthawk said:
@ saximus: I heard the same story, apparently that's why DEH put them on the class 3
license-holder list. The version I heard was he was drunk at the time and had no back-up which just goes to show, true or not there's a lesson there.
Erik was not drunk. The media tried to sensationalise the story, including taking footage of about 12 months worth of cans ready to be recycled. Of course, they concentrated on the alcohol cans, not the soft drink.
Erik's death was part of the reason for Scrub Pythons being elevated in the permit system...the other one is just common sense. They are an incredibly dangerous snake that are underestimated by a lot of keepers, particularly those that sell them to novices or kids.
saximus said:
I'd be interested to hear the true story Scorps. I understand that it was a tragedy and there were people on here who were close to him but after searching for the news articles I've found it happened five or six years ago and still the "true" story hasn't been told. If it wasn't plain complacency (or drunkenness as some news stories said) then there may be a chance to learn something so people don't get in the same situation. However if we are just told "that's not what happened" with no further explanation we are forced to believe the information we actually have.
I'd also like to point out that I see a difference between complacency and carelessness. Complacency comes from not having any issues over a period of time and slowly letting your guard down. This is easy for anyone to do in any situation like Zeke pointed out. Carelessness is a total lack of forethought about the possible consequences. Careless owners have no business owning big snakes but I'd say almost every keeper has become complacent to some extent at some point in time.
Just my two cents...
If you do a search on APS, you will find my account of what happened, which couldn't be any more true considering I worked with the guy and was holding on to the snake while the police took DNA swabs from it's face.
The biggest piece of advice I can give you is to take everything in the media with a very large grain of salt. At best, what you see in the media is based on a true story. Just like a movie, they will freely embellish parts of the story to make it more interesting...they have one motive, and that's to sell newspapers.
I don't enjoy rehashing the story of what is ultimately the gruesome death of a good friend of mine, but people continue to bring it up and I feel obliged to defend him when he isn't in a position to do so.
ingie said:
I was told by someone that claimed to know a swedish person working in a venom research centre in SA I think a few years ago and he was handling a large Scrubby or
Olive (I can't remember which one it was) while he was on the phone to his family or friends and he said something like "I have to go the snake is getting a bit crazy"... and by then it had a good hold of him and he didn't make it
I'd love to know who you spoke to. There's an element of truth to that story, in that he had called me and left a voicemail to see if I wanted to come over. I had checked my phone, but was about to go to bed so I didn't call him back.
What actually happened...
Erik was a highly experienced keeper. He owned a reptile zoo in Sweden, and had published and presented multiple articles on the captive husbandry and reproduction of several species, including Burmese Pythons and Red Spitting Cobra's. He had kept all of the large pythons and boa's - Burmese Pythons, Green Anaconda's, Scrub Pythons, African Rock Pythons, Boa Constrictors, Reticulated Pythons etc.
He was employed at Venom Supplies as a curator, where his abilities were amazing. He had tremendous success in the captive reproduction of nearly all of the species we kept, some of which hadn't been bred before in Australia (and haven't been bred since his death...). One of his most outstanding achievements that I witnesses was successfully triple-clutching Inland Taipans, with three clutches of viable eggs in 5 months. I know of only one other person who has done this.
On the weekend that Erik died, we had changed our work schedule around. We generally worked Monday - Saturday, with Sunday being a day off. This particular week, we were taking Saturday off and working the Sunday, as we had important visitors on the Monday. Erik had called me on Friday evening, to see if I would like to come over (as mentioned above). I missed his call, and when I listened to the voicemail message, I was going to bed so didn't call him back. That was the last time I heard from him.
I wasn't working on the Sunday, but my best mate/house mate was. She called me and let me know that Erik had died...he hadn't turned up at work, which was highly unusual as he lived for that place, so they went down and checked. He was dead on the lounge room floor, and the snake was on the opposite side of the room, coiled up. I got to his place pretty soon afterwards, and assisted with a few different things, including restraining the snake while they took DNA swabs from it.
From what we can ascertain, it seems the snake has bitten Erik on the face...he has reached up with both hands to pull it off, and it has wrapped its coils around his arms and pulled them tight into his chest. This was a BIG snake...over 5 metres long, however it could have happened to anyone.
The situation that unfolded was Erik's fault. He should not have had the snake out, but his only mistake was complacency (which he very rarely showed). He was not drunk. There was a shed skin in the enclosure, which seems to be the reason he had it out.
I hope this clears some things up. Erik's death was the biggest waste of ability and knowledge I have ever witnessed, and he is sorely missed.
Attached below is a press release by Peter Mirtschin, the owned of Venom Supplies.
The Death of Erik Attmarsson
We have been advised by the Nuriootpa police (Sgt. Bernadette Zimmermann),
that we will not be furnished with any information from the coroner's report
which means we will not learn the cause of death for some time, if ever.
We would like to correct some issues distributed by the media.
1. Generally pythons do not crush their victims as claimed in the Advertiser
2/05/05. This sensational reporting is highly misleading and unwarranted.
Pythons generally constrict their prey causing asphyxiation. Only in the
case of large pythons and very small prey items do any broken bones occur.
2. Snakes were never located outside Erik's place. There was an empty
aquarium on the veranda at some stage which was awaiting transfer elsewhere.
3. There were only 3 snakes kept by Erik. All were non-venomous. They
were 2 scrub pythons and 1 file snake.
4. As far as I know, snakes were never allowed free range of the house.
5. At times snakes had to be removed from their cages for management
reasons.
6. The incident was not a Venom Supplies Pty Ltd matter. Linking Venom
Supplies Pty Ltd by association is both misleading, mischievous and
unsympathetic to a small business that has spent years developing a good
reputation in a difficult field. At the time, we requested all media to
limit our exposure but it was not observed.
7. Efforts to film parts of our business from adjacent private properties
and from the front of our block were without any concern of the hurtfulness
it could cause in spite of our objection to it. The use of file footage,
photographs and statements linking our business was not authorized and was
without due concern for the hurt or damage it could do to our business.
8. Efforts to taint Erik's character by all Adelaide media was despicable.
Erik was a model employee with incredible knowledge. He was responsible in
all aspects of his work. He was a totally safe worker. He was highly
regarded at work and outside work and as a supervisor. He was
scientifically motivated. What he did in private was exactly that -
private.
9. At least one section of the media illegally broke into his house and
filmed within his house. They moved items around to suit their script. It
was a case of manufactured evidence.
10. It was myself and my wife who discovered the body after he failed to
arrive at work on Sunday. My wife became distraught and required
hospitalization. Our staff have been devastated by the matter and one has
required stress leave and medical supervision. The media did not respect
this and hounded us intensely on Sunday night and Monday.
11. A scrub python was noticed in the room just after the police arrived
and it was immediately placed back in its cage and later transferred to the
National Parks in the afternoon. There was never any threat of snakes loose
in the surrounding area. The Advertiser unnecessarily caused community
alarm in this regard. We had members of the local community ringing us
concerned that there was a large python on the loose.
12. At the point of writing this response, I still am unaware of the
official cause of death. All the media focus has been totally absorbed in
the python as the cause. It may well be the cause but surely waiting for
some official finding would have been prudent. In the absence of an
official finding is no excuse to manufacture a case.
13. The media always claim they have a responsibility to the public to
inform them. I have no problem with that. I believe they also have a
responsibility to be accurate and truthful and in this case it appears
little attempt was made to observe this principle.
14. I hope that there is some national media body that can investigate this
matter and take some action to limit the actions of the media in the future
to ensure they do not repeat such behavior. I also hope the media have a
long hard look at themselves and take some responsible action to achieve
more responsible reporting and behaviour.
Peter Mirtschin
Tanunda
South Australia