Hi guys,
I was just wondering whether anyone had already put in a "Proposed changes to Schedules to the Wildlife Regulations" submission for Mitchell's Water Monitor, Varanus mitchelli, to be considered for the 2012 regulation rewrite.
For those that aren't aware, the only aquatic monitors that the Victorian DSE currently allows us to keep are the Mertens and the Mangrove. This makes no sense at all - why let you keep the larger varieties, with their extra housing overheads, and not the smaller variety? Particularly when it is able to be kept in most other states.
Cheers,
Nic
I was just wondering whether anyone had already put in a "Proposed changes to Schedules to the Wildlife Regulations" submission for Mitchell's Water Monitor, Varanus mitchelli, to be considered for the 2012 regulation rewrite.
For those that aren't aware, the only aquatic monitors that the Victorian DSE currently allows us to keep are the Mertens and the Mangrove. This makes no sense at all - why let you keep the larger varieties, with their extra housing overheads, and not the smaller variety? Particularly when it is able to be kept in most other states.
Cheers,
Nic