vampstorso
Very Well-Known Member
Sorry what i read from that is that you are saying "keeping alive an unattractive animal is different to keeping alive an animal without maximised life quality.
Let me just say from what i think there I'm not that attractive but my quality of life is fine?
Please correct me if I'm wrong but it reads to me that if its unattractive it wouldn't have a maximimum life quality ?
Not what I'm saying at all.
What I said was that keeping alive animals that aren't deemed attractive or have a superficial defect (a defect that doesn't effect it's functioning) is different (and hence okay), to keeping alive an animal with impaired functioning causing it stress or the constant need for interference/intervention. Keeping alive animals with severe impairments causing it to not function properly is not a second chance, it's forced suffering.
I say this with the assumption that you're asking for animals with issues worse than a kinked tail, or missing foot, as those problems are generally superficial. But you mentioned neurological issues in another thread, that's a whole new ball game.
Last edited: