crazzzylizard
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2012
- Messages
- 135
- Reaction score
- 0
According to the list our snakes arn't aggressive enough nor have they killed enough people
I thought our vens were no 1.?
According to the list our snakes arn't aggressive enough nor have they killed enough people
Thanks for that, always something new to learn.Using the normal testing parameters Aussie vens are way up there
But they dont kill many people for 2 reasons
First aid in Aus is far superior to first aid in the countries where most of the other potentially dangerous snakes live
Secondly.. Most Aussie snakes inject venom less than 20% of the time
Most Asian and African snakes inject venom around 85% ++ of the time
So although the Aussie venom may be far stronger, statistically you have a much higher chance of survival
I hadnt bothered looking at the list until now
Its a load of garbage
Definitely way incorrect with blatant errors and miscalculations
My comment was
Please fix the blatant errors in this before someone gets hurt
All pythons are non venomous and no python should be anywhere near this list
Your burmese python is a reticulated python
Your eastern brown is an olive python
Your russel viper is a harmless tree snake
No mention of saw scale viper??
In any serious list it must rate number one two or three
Yeah, I have posted the same comments twice now, but they wont allow the truth to be spoken
The poor moderator must be getting the poops by now :lol:
Yeah, I have posted the same comments twice now, but they wont allow the truth to be spoken
The poor moderator must be getting the poops by now :lol:
they might not acknowledge your comments but they have removed the photo's of the EB and the burmese just checked at 8.10pm
Enter your email address to join: