what evidence can you give us to support the above statement please Gordo or Stephen?
So there is a 'possibility' of them being different mutations, but we won't know until two albino animals from 'each strain' are mated together.
But chances are they are probably the exact same mutation as Blondie and related anyway. So if that turns out to be the case, what would make them so special in comparison to the existing strain from Southern Cross?
Obviously they may have some different bloodlines in their make-up but are they so different to the albinos from SXR anyway?
Please realise I"m not trying to put these animals down or dispute whats been claimed so far, I would just like some clarification of exactly what is known for fact so far.
One thing that puzzles me is this:
If this other strain has been before blondies offspring were available, why has there been no mention of them before this? And why mention them now? If they have been around and kept under wraps, I would have at least put a SXR animal across one of these animals (if they were mine) to at least prove they are the same mutation or different before I'd make this above news public. So far all these claims of a "new line and new albino mutation" have been suggested without one piece of evidence (that I"ve seen anyway) to back the claims up.
It would seem reasonable to me to wait until some facts are known (eg: same mutation or different albino etc) before publicly making claims with no evidence at all.
I hope that it is a new albino mutation etc as that would be fantastic, but would like some clarification please on what are the facts so far as I"m very interested in this thread.
thanks heaps