As I said if it's in your house then maybe something has to be done. If it's in your yard then you probably live somewhere rural, in which case how many are in your yard that you don't even see? Killing it achieves nothing. There may be more already in the vicinity, or if not there probably soon will be once this one is killed and gone. I probably wouldn't let the kids play in the yard while the snake was there. And your comment demonstrated exactly why my analogy with cars is perfect, rather than off. Your key points demonstrate this: "would you remove a snake if you had a young child that was too young to teach about snakes?" As I said above I'd probably move the child. Not unlike if the kid wanted to play on a highway. It's a lot easier to move the kid than it is to stop the cars and divert the traffic to a different road. Additionally you state you tried your best to "keep your kids away from the road to avoid being run over and moved onto teaching them road safety when they were old enough". Similarly why not try your best to keep your kids away from dangerous snakes and move onto teaching them animal safety when they are old enough? I really fail to see the difference in logic and disagree completely that my analogy is "off", particularly when you have inadvertently demonstrated exactly why it is a good one. There are no guarantees in life. Killing a snake doesn't change that fact. Neither will killing a passing motorist. It might be next snake or car that gets the kid....Would you remove a venomous snake from your backyard if you had a young child that was too young to teach about snakes? I am in no way condoning killing snakes but I would remove a venomous snake from my backyard. Also your analogy with cars is a little off, I certainly tried my best as a parent to keep my kids away from the road to avoid being run over and moved onto teaching them road safety when they were old enough.
Last edited: