I fail to see how you can justify a comment like that when people with a strong interest in reptiles are uncertain. Not to mention that you are looking at a photograph (= stationary) of a full snake and not catching glimpses of it moving through grass. The reality is that people who don't know snakes don't know the difference. The recent spate of taipan bites and deaths does help in eliciting a calm and reasonable response to what people think is a taipan.Just had a look at the pic on my IPad, 100% Brown Tree Snake. No doubt at all. What a hero, killing a Harmless Brown Tree Snake. Not sure what ID book he looked at to identify it as a Taipan but I'd be asking for my money back.
I fail to see how you can justify a comment like that when people with a strong interest in reptiles are uncertain. Not to mention that you are looking at a photograph (= stationary) of a full snake and not catching glimpses of it moving through grass. The reality is that people who don't know snakes don't know the difference. The recent spate of taipan bites and deaths does help in eliciting a calm and reasonable response to what people think is a taipan.
The head could have been flattened when it was killed and irrespective, I can put in some links to pics of a taipan where the head is quite distinct from the neck.
What would be more constructive is giving your reasons, as the rules of this section request. That would help others in their field identification skills.
Please note, that I do not know the attitude of the person responsible nore the exact circumstances. However, it would be appropriate to withhold judgement until these were confirmed and made public.
No question that the man did the wrong thing. It is an unsafe and an unnecessary act. Whether he did so out of ignorance or out of malice towards snakes, I don’t know. The point I would make is that it is not our place to assume or to reconstruct the story to make him out as the villain. Education and not condemnation is required.I'm pretty sure most people with a good knowledge of snakes would have no problems to confidently I'd that as a Brown Tree Snake from that picture. If you check some other sights and some of the more recent comments on the article you will see some very knowledgable people agreeing on what this snake is. If you look closely at the pic you can even see the banding towards the tail end that is typical of BTS's. Looking at overall body shape and colour and this looks absolutely nothing like a Taipan. Even if it was a Taipan, that in no was excuses how this idiot acted. Anyone who has had anything at all to do with snakes will know this whole story is a load of BS. Also I think if you read the article you will find that Ron killed the snake first and then id'd it from his book.
No question that the man did the wrong thing. It is an unsafe and an unnecessary act. Whether he did so out of ignorance or out of malice towards snakes, I don’t know. The point I would make is that it is not our place to assume or to reconstruct the story to make him out as the villain. Education and not condemnation is required.
“Anyone who has had anything at all to do with snakes will know this whole story is a load of BS.” I know a little bit about snakes and I did not think the story sounded false. You arrive home, see a snake in the yard in fading light, so go over to have a closer look. Most snakes would shoot through as you got close. A BTS not in a tree or near cover is much more likely to arc up than flee. So the home owner is confronted with a very aggro 2m brown coloured snake that is not moving off. He grabs the nearest available object to dispatch it. I fail to see the b.s.
“this looks absolutely nothing like a Taipan” is inaccurate and does not help. To the experienced eye the two species are distinctly different. However, that does not mean they do not look alike (for at least certain forms).
I do appreciate that the attitude of someone reporting the killing of a snake to the local paper makes their motives automatically suspect. However, given the snake was thought to be a Taipan, it may be motivated by community awareness. We don’t know!
Here is where education would help. If someone were to write to the paper explaining it was actually a BTS and describing this snake's behaviour, how venomous they are, how not to attract them into yards and how to identify them, that would be constructive. We want to get rid of the ignorance. I might add here that being ignorant of BTS behaviour does not make one an “idiot”. Just as well or there would be some upset people on this forum.
I like blues posts and think they are all pretty much relevant to the topic at hand. I think he is a very knowledgable bloke and enjoy reading his posts.The shortest, and most pertinent post you have made..
Enter your email address to join: