A snakes revenge
- Thread starter andynic07
- Start date
Help Support Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum:
- Status
DarwinBrianT
Well-Known Member
But will anything happen to him for killing a snake.... no. Will people keep killing snakes ... yes. They should start making examples out of people.
Newhere
Well-Known Member
So he found a snake in a vase then chopped it in half with a shovel, then he came back and stuck his hand in the vase to remove the snake and got bitten. How do you chop a snake in half thats inside a vase? Must of been a big vase or a tiny shovel.
blackhead13
Not so new Member
It is a little funny that he got bitten...not wanting to sound mean. Lets face it, if this was a dog, cat, or any other animal that had been domesticated he would probably facing some sort of animal cruelty charges. Would the paper have written an article in the same manner or would they have condemned him? Maybe the headline could have read..."Frightened man that killed ferocious killer poodle to face court"
It just seems that if an animal is poisonous it is ok to just kill it!
I wonder how many people were killed or seriously injured by a family pet last year as compared to these viscous killer snakes.
It just seems that if an animal is poisonous it is ok to just kill it!
I wonder how many people were killed or seriously injured by a family pet last year as compared to these viscous killer snakes.
GBWhite
Very Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,006
- Reaction score
- 1,440
Hi,
Just to be the devils advocate it is not as cut and dry as some would imply when a lay person encounters a snake of any kind. We have a bias view because we keep them as pets or are engaged in the industry or in the field and have a good understanding of these animals.
Many of us on here would be fully aware there have been many occasions where captive reptiles (including snakes) have suffered a worse death at the hands of their keepers. Granted they are often considered accidents but that is open to definition dependant on the circumstances.
It's alright for us to sit back and berate people who know no better and believe they are doing the right thing when they kill a snake but in reality there are many factors which come into play.
No one will ever be charged for killing a wild snake because the law considers it an act that "any reasonable person" would undertake as a means to protect themselves, others, domestic pets or stock from an animal they believe to be dangerous. The same interpretation applies to other native land and marine creatures whether protected by legislation or not; eg - arachnids, crocs, octopus, dingoes and sharks.
It is not actually illegal to kill a snake if a person believes it is a threat to themselves, others, pets or stock. This applies even if the person does not know the type of snake and whether it is venomous or not. Unfortunately it's just the way it is.
There are many incidents where "pet" dogs which cause serious injury or death are put down. I live in the scrub and am fully aware that there are instances when dogs have been shot just because they are considered a threat to people or stock. It is quite acceptable to shoot a dog that wanders onto property outside the owners without it actually causing any harm to anything and just because it poses a possible threat to stock.
I am also aware that there have also been plenty of instances where domestic cats have suffered the same fate because they have killed poultry.
The snake in this story wasn't in the vase when it was first discovered. My understanding is that it was lying on top of a concrete grave cover and was trapped in some exposed steel bars. Believing it to be a threat to himself and/or anyone attending the cemetery he did what he thought was the right thing to do at the time and cut it in half with the shovel with the intention to kill it. Following the act he took the bottom half away. When he returned to remove the other half it had moved and the head was out of view, hidden in the vase. When he went to pick this half up and remove it the snake had not yet died of the injury and turned around and bit him in a reflex action.
George.
Just to be the devils advocate it is not as cut and dry as some would imply when a lay person encounters a snake of any kind. We have a bias view because we keep them as pets or are engaged in the industry or in the field and have a good understanding of these animals.
Many of us on here would be fully aware there have been many occasions where captive reptiles (including snakes) have suffered a worse death at the hands of their keepers. Granted they are often considered accidents but that is open to definition dependant on the circumstances.
It's alright for us to sit back and berate people who know no better and believe they are doing the right thing when they kill a snake but in reality there are many factors which come into play.
No one will ever be charged for killing a wild snake because the law considers it an act that "any reasonable person" would undertake as a means to protect themselves, others, domestic pets or stock from an animal they believe to be dangerous. The same interpretation applies to other native land and marine creatures whether protected by legislation or not; eg - arachnids, crocs, octopus, dingoes and sharks.
It is not actually illegal to kill a snake if a person believes it is a threat to themselves, others, pets or stock. This applies even if the person does not know the type of snake and whether it is venomous or not. Unfortunately it's just the way it is.
There are many incidents where "pet" dogs which cause serious injury or death are put down. I live in the scrub and am fully aware that there are instances when dogs have been shot just because they are considered a threat to people or stock. It is quite acceptable to shoot a dog that wanders onto property outside the owners without it actually causing any harm to anything and just because it poses a possible threat to stock.
I am also aware that there have also been plenty of instances where domestic cats have suffered the same fate because they have killed poultry.
The snake in this story wasn't in the vase when it was first discovered. My understanding is that it was lying on top of a concrete grave cover and was trapped in some exposed steel bars. Believing it to be a threat to himself and/or anyone attending the cemetery he did what he thought was the right thing to do at the time and cut it in half with the shovel with the intention to kill it. Following the act he took the bottom half away. When he returned to remove the other half it had moved and the head was out of view, hidden in the vase. When he went to pick this half up and remove it the snake had not yet died of the injury and turned around and bit him in a reflex action.
George.
JAS101
Very Well-Known Member
I bet his thinking it would have been a better idea to ring a snake remover about now .rather then taking action into his own hands .
T
Trimeresurus
Guest
If you're gonna kill any animal destroy its brain, seriously would you cut any other animal inhalf and let it bleed to death?
Thelizardqueen
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2014
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
Why would he be in intensive care from a RBBS bite though? They're not considered deadly and the only recorded death was an infant in the early 1800s. You can't have them on a class 3 in NSW. The venom affects the muscles. The story went from "Intensive care" to "My hand swelled up for a week."
- Status
