I have had purebreds, I have had mutts....Just because someone has 'papers' for a dog doesn't guarantee you quality. I speak from experience.
Most 'breeders' of purebreds have only two motivators.
One: Awards, Plaques, Trophies, and anything else that says they're so clever because they've inbred their dogs enough to fit the 'fancy' standards....
Two: Money when pup time rolls on.
Anyone who says otherwise is flat out a liar. Ask anyone who owns a purebred dog, and who breeds said dog....how much do you charge for a pup...watch the dollarsigns pop into their eyes as they tell you some exorbitant amount.
Charging a lot doesn't guarantee the dog will lead a wonderful life, and be loved. I've seen purebred animals in shelters....alongside the mutts.
I don't see the problem with someone selling pups that are technically 'purebred'- just because they don't have papers. You only need 'papers' if you are going to breed your dogs for showing, or to sell them for ridiculous amounts of money. If licensed breeders can sell mutts (for example maltese X ****zu) for $500+....then someone like Sam (for instance) who can actually say her animals are purebred, should also be allowed to charge ridiculous amounts of money.
As far as I am concerned- if I see anything crossed with anything in a pet shop for $500....I wouldn't buy it. How is a cross breed dog purebred? It just isn't.
How many breeders of malamutes for example get calls from new owners fretting about it doing something, or not doing something? A lot I'd say.....Whats the difference?
In this case, Sam has scruples, has morals and I believe wouldn't leave anyone who'd purchased ANY animal from her in the lurch, or without some sort of negotiated resolution, in which both parties are happy.
She is a good, kind person with a heart of gold, and doesn't need to be disparaged by someone who just came in here to spout off his 'Fanciers' crud.
Mods, I'm surprised you allowed it for so long.
Soul...did you find that paperwork yet? LMAO!!