In the only revision of tiger snake taxonomy two species are recognized, Notechis ater and Notechis scutatus (Rawlinson 1991). Rawlinson s scheme includes all of the mainland New South Wales tiger snakes as N. scutatus and all of the Western Australian, Flinders Ranges, Tasmanian, and island populations as N. ater. This scheme is also used by Cogger (2000). In contrast, Wilson and Knowles (1988) recognize N. ater as all black tiger snakes in South Australia and Tasmania, including the island populations and N. scutatus as all the mainland tiger snakes (including Western Australia). A number of Notechis ater subspecies also have been recognized (reviewed in Rawlinson 1991): Notechis ater ater for the Flinders Ranges (SA) tiger snakes, N. ater humphreysi from New Year Island and N. ater serventyi from Chappell Island, both in the Bass Strait, N. ater occidentalis for the Western Australian tiger snakes, and N. ater. niger for the remaining South Australian offshore island tiger snakes. Each of these subspeci c descriptions were based on few data and one of them was based on a comparison with erroneous data on eastern tiger snakes (Rawlinson 1991). Although more popular accounts have continued to recognize these subspecies, Rawlinson (1991) pointed out that only Notechis ater and Notechis scutatus were diagnosable and that even the division between the two species is somewhat arbitrary (Cogger 2000). We tested alternative topologies that re ect the classi cation schemes of Rawlinson (1991) and Wilson and Knowles (1988) and both schemes can be soundly rejected by our data (-ln greater by 46.77, P 0.036 for Rawlinson, 1991; -ln greater by 81.52, P 0.001 for Wilson and Knowles 1988). Both classi cation schemes use body size and color variation as two of the most important characteristics, but our molecular data clearly show that neither is phylogenetically useful in tiger snake taxonomy. Given the extremely small amount of genetic divergence between tiger snake populations across their range and the extremely short amount of time required for major body size shifts (and presumably color changes) to evolve, we conclude that tiger snakes comprise a single polymorphic species, N. scutatus, under a phylogenetic species concept.