Fireflyshuffle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2007
- Messages
- 694
- Reaction score
- 0
you have a great point there forensik.. its just a matter of where do we start?
Umm, sidetracking from the main topic here but how many people have actually successfully fed their snakes a live fish sitting in a water bowl?
Green Tree snakes take them readily and fish are sometimes the only food source they will take in captivity.Umm, sidetracking from the main topic here but how many people have actually successfully fed their snakes a live fish sitting in a water bowl?
I was told by one of the largest native fish producers in the country that feeding a live vertabrate is against the law. Not insects. It makes me wonder though, in the code of practice for reptile husbandry it states how some snakes don't accept mice and live fish can be placed in their water bowl. So i don't know.
That is my point - where does the definition lie? if you read my post properly, you would see that I'm not condoning or encouraging it, just curious as to what is acceptable , both morally and legally.
Forensick, on Jamie Oliver's show they explained that that is exactly what does happen to many of the culled chicks - they go to zoos to feed the pythons. It's probably not worth their while to sell to individual buyers tho. I might be making incorrect assumptions here, but I always thought that was where Pythoness's chicks came from...
I do not think it right or neccessary to feed live animals to anything! :x No matter what the purpose put forward, it is still cruel and inhumane. That is why groups like the RSPCA exist. Before anyone starts going off at me, (and there will be some), at least prey animals stand a 'sporting' chance in the wild. I believe that people need to stop and think about the possible stress, injury the bird (or rodent could suffer)
Btw, I'm not having a go at anyone in particular.
Enter your email address to join: