Kirby, you keep mentioning UVC in compacts but have nowhere stated where this information came from. Obviously you don't have the technology to test these things yourself, so I assume you have read them somewhere and believe them to be true. I would like to read the scientific paper or the results from some sort of qualified testing. To make these statements is fine, but some proof would be nice.
"6" away: 52 uW/cm^2
9" away: 25 uW/cm^2
12" away: 12 uW/cm^2
^ these results show nothing, at 6 inches, potentially too close in terms of uvc, 52 uW/cm^2 you should be wantign closer to 100+
250-300 being close to natural sun. "
Have you tested the suns rays early in the morning? A lot of dragons bask in the earlier hours of the morning and normally reside during the hotter parts of the day. So they would not necisarily be basking in 'full' UVB rays when they are at their peak. Also, where does it state that they need closer to 100+ UVB? I have heard as little as 30-40uW/mw^2 is sufficient, but have seen no scientific proof on any of this.
I also know lots of people that use URS compacts and batton style tubes and none have had any complaints at all form this product. It seems unusual that only yourself and possible a couple of others seem to have had this problem even though these tubes have been tested as stated by URS.
JasonL, this must be our favourite topic.......
:lol: Out of curiosity, what brand was the type of UV tube you were using? If you don't wish to mention names here, that's fine, can you PM me the details, I am interested in knowing.
Cheers
Daz