Personally, like many other forums or sites such as eBay, I really support the idea of APS having a negative and positive feedback section. This can be tightly moderated by the mods and perhaps have a small window pop up stipulating the very strict do's and dont's before entering any negative feedback and even having a similar page to what ebay use for entering negative or positive feedback. As everyone knows with eBay, the person wishing to enter positive or negative feedback only gets the one chance to input, and the reciever of the negative input also has the opportunity to reply...end of debate!
At least than, both sides of the party get to have a say, and onlookers can make there own decision as to wether they wish to deal with this person in the future.
I hope this makes sense.
The reason I strongly support it is because throughout this particular post, I've read quite a few times about a certain sponsor ripping people off. This makes me wonder if this is the same person that has recently taken me for a ride also. Now this is the problem, I did not know anything about this person until now that it has happened, which of course is to late for me and I'm sure for others also. So if people like myself are not aware of certain con artists like this, how do we know? What can we do after this person has left us high and dry? APS can't help you, so who do we turn too for help when situations like this occur other than to seek a blood sucking solicitor to try and get your money back, which in the end is just not worth it due to the expense!
This is just one example of having such a tool improvised on APS, so that people have the opportunity to look at any negative feedback before they go purchasing any animals, products or courses of certain people.
This is just my own opinion.
sienna