As you will note Scott, the relevant section has been pasted in my last post, the letter was in response to a vitriolic attack by another person here in Victoria that required a reply. I don't think that it is appropriate to post the whole letter as you mention it is not relevant.
I just hope that any study done is not biased, which already appears to be the case, btw as mentioned throughout this thread, many of my clients are actually obliged by OH&S Act to use non-contact methods of control (no hands on), where ever possible. We do teach the use of them, but we also emphasize that they are a last resort technique and all other options should be investigated first. Tongs are not the answer to safe handling techniques, only experience will make a fully competent handler, this cannot be gathered in two days, two weeks, two months or even two years, it is a lifetime of work. Even the best handlers have bad days! Any good quality course will emphasize this from the start, our own statement is that the completion of our course is the start of a long learning journey.
Just to clarify, rubber snakes are only used for techniques which are known to cause stress or potential harm, all other techniques use live snakes including venomous snakes. I find it interesting that people are so anti-tong, as the old equipment does cause injury, yet pinning is fine.
There are several cases of TV personalities and other experienced handlers injuring and killing snakes due to pinning, and also getting serious bites while pinning. So why do the same people who hate tongs, like pinning? In both cases correct training will reduce the risks to both animal and handler, but poor technique will cause harm!