Moreliavridis
Well-Known Member
To me solar comes out in front on all three bottom lines. There is more to decisions than just dollars. Although solar stacked up financially the environmental and social benefits are there to.
Unfortunately I use about 10K worth of power a year now at 20c/kwh, so with my system I break about even, but by 2006 I expect power will be closer to 60 cents /kwh than to todays 20cents so it should still stack up financially then
Perhaps its just a way for be to sooth my guilt using so much power warming 500 or so snakes and freezing a few cubic meters of food. I dont know if you would call it carbon nuetral but it is better than just burning coal.
I agree that solar is defiantly better than coal fired power stations (if i didn't i wouldn't make money haha) And will also help you save money.
I just don't agree with the tax and all the cuts to stuff like solar power.
If they used the money from the tax to make green energy more cheaper and readily available it may be a good idea but they rant they are just making it worse.