slacker
Very Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2007
- Messages
- 1,423
- Reaction score
- 2
I've been in contact with Andy (ANTARESIA1) about these since the thread has been closed and felt this clarification needed to be publicly posted, thus this thread.
Now, Andy had said that the true locality was as close to Mt Carbine as it was to Mossman. I took this to mean that the locality was neither Mossman, nor Mt Carbine and that a false, arbitrary locality had been put on them intentionally.
What Andy had actually been trying to say is the animals were found in between those two locations, and given there's a whole lot of nothing in between those locations, which location were they to name them after?
Now, Andy had said that the true locality was as close to Mt Carbine as it was to Mossman. I took this to mean that the locality was neither Mossman, nor Mt Carbine and that a false, arbitrary locality had been put on them intentionally.
What Andy had actually been trying to say is the animals were found in between those two locations, and given there's a whole lot of nothing in between those locations, which location were they to name them after?