Rude Avatars

[AGAMIDAE]

Just a quick note, there are some members of this site asking if it is fair to the younger viewers to see the kind of "porn like" avatars on this "G" rated forum.

I agree with those that are concerned about protecting the reputation of this site....please lets keep it clean...and I am sure there are other forums on the net that will accomidate that sort of thing.


This is not a warning of any kind but could you please change them in respect of other that use this public forum.

Thankyou

Marc

 

[moosenoose]

Yeah Sherms! :lol: I can't help from wanting to look at you bouncing away all day! :lol: It's kind of mezmerising, like an inner peace

 

[craig.a.c]

Couldn't agree more. This is meant to be a family friendly site not "soft porn".

 

[Snake Catcher Victoria]

is this better...were u talking about mine,,,lol

 

[BROWNS]

beats me why people use these avatars on a reptile site too....makes ya wonder but there have been some pearlers :lol:

 

[Guest]

Is this older one better?

 

[SnakeWrangler]

I think that kind of thing could be considered "soft porn" teamsherman. I wouldn't want my kids looking at it.

 

[Linus]

I wouldn't mind what people used but as I only ever log on at work I would prefer to have less softish porny type stuff on the avatars as it can look a bit suss when you have a thread with several of the dodgy avatars in it.

And a bloke at my work was recently severly reprimanded for looking at "inappropriate" content.

 

[moosenoose]

What's wrong with funbags?? :lol: I miss them :cry: :lol:

 

[rodentrancher]

Very cute Alan. :lol:

 

[Guest]

Its what i want to be when i grow up, a lego man rally driver!!!

 

[angelrose]

Grow up, your never going to grow up sherm... hehe....

Angel

 

[Guest]

Grow up, your never going to grow up sherm... hehe....

Angel

LOL, i know, but who really wants to?

 

[instar]

Not whilever you have a billy ray wig eh Sherm

 

[womas4me]

those ' soft porn ' avatars are no different to a target catalogue with lingerie models in it. Maybe some people just need to be more realistic.

 

[Linus]

like i said i don't really care. but the lady sitting next to me might. And that can have ramifications beyond my control.

And for the record...I've never seen a target catalogue with two girls kissing!

 

[soulweaver]

those ' soft porn ' avatars are no different to a target catalogue with lingerie models in it. Maybe some people just need to be more realistic.

They have porn in target catalogue's now?? and to think i throw them away each week.

 

[Stevo]

I just hope the person with the save the whales avatar keeps it cause it cracks me up every time i see it

 

[AGAMIDAE]

those ' soft porn ' avatars are no different to a target catalogue with lingerie models in it. Maybe some people just need to be more realistic.

I can sort of see what you are saying, what I am stumped on is that target are using models to advertise their products..right..ok...those that look at those catalogue..for a quick perve is kind of sick...however that a total different debate...this is a non pervie reptile public forum not a free catalogue "advertising product" not "soft porn"....

 

[AGAMIDAE]

oh...and thankyou for those that have changed there avatars.....