What are these stats based on? The american study which has already been posted in here atleast 3 times (
http://roominate.com/blogg/dog_attacks_1982_to_2006_clifton.pdf) shows this to be not true (atleast in america) and I very much doubt it is true for Australia.
People in this thread just continue to fail to realise that although most individual dogs from all breeds are harmless and friendly some breeds are more likely to be bad eggs, esp. when kept by low lifes. This is not any individuals fault, just a correlation. Since guns were outlawed in Australia without a licence we have had a massive reduction in gun related crime.
The NAZIs tried to do what dog breeders like yourself have been doing to dogs for centuries.
In the above quote you refered to a website that refers to a study.
Above I have linked to the actual study results and as you can see your website is fabricated.
Does the readership of this website deserve an appology from yourself for spreading fabricated lies that have been shown to be false?