giggle
Well-Known Member
LMAO its funny how not one, but a bunch of people jumped on my comment as though I am an experienced person that should know better.
My post was what I gathered from the comment regarding siblings. If that isnt the case, then I too dont understand why siblings will be a problem in other peoples hands... if siblings can never produce jag offspring. And some of you misunderstood what I was saying anyway (the comment of siblings never having neuro issues).
Its funny how a quest for information ends in bickering about who knows more. I've already said I know nothing about this morph.
Though... one of you said its a co-dom morph. Co-dominant implies two sets of genes required to show jag phenotype... in that case a sibling may have one but not both of the genes... therefore not displaying the jag phenotype... but therefore cleverly paired with the right sibling, can produce phenotypical jags :|
My post was what I gathered from the comment regarding siblings. If that isnt the case, then I too dont understand why siblings will be a problem in other peoples hands... if siblings can never produce jag offspring. And some of you misunderstood what I was saying anyway (the comment of siblings never having neuro issues).
Its funny how a quest for information ends in bickering about who knows more. I've already said I know nothing about this morph.
Though... one of you said its a co-dom morph. Co-dominant implies two sets of genes required to show jag phenotype... in that case a sibling may have one but not both of the genes... therefore not displaying the jag phenotype... but therefore cleverly paired with the right sibling, can produce phenotypical jags :|